Shoulder replacement (arthroplasty) replaces damaged bone and cartilage with prosthetic components to relieve pain and restore function, typically due to advanced arthritis or complex fractures.
Shoulder replacement is most appropriate for patients with advanced arthritis who have significant pain and loss of function that is no longer responding to non-surgical care. Good candidates are generally those whose daily life is being meaningfully limited by their shoulder. Certain complex shoulder fractures are also treated with shoulder replacement.
For most patients, surgery becomes the right conversation only after non-surgical options are no longer providing adequate relief. For shoulder arthritis, this typically means a course of anti-inflammatory medications (such as tylenol, ibuprofen or naproxen), activity modification, physical therapy, and corticosteroid injections.
The choice depends on the health of your rotator cuff muscles.
| Feature | Anatomic (Total Shoulder) | Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty |
|---|---|---|
| Design | Mimics natural anatomy (Ball on humerus, socket on scapula). | Swaps anatomy (Ball on scapula, socket on humerus). |
| Typical candidates | Arthritis with intact rotator cuff | Rotator cuff tear arthropathy, massive cuff tears, or complex fractures. |
| Requirement | Requires a healthy, intact rotator cuff. | Used when the rotator cuff is torn or non-functional. |
| Mechanics | Depends on rotator cuff to maintain center of rotation & help move the shoulder | Depends on the reversed anatomy to maintain center of rotation. Uses the deltoid muscle to lift the arm. |

Modern shoulder replacements are durable, with survival data comparable to hip and knee replacements. For anatomic total shoulder replacement, studies report implant survival rates of approximately 92–96% at 10 years. For reverse total shoulder replacement, large registry studies show 10-year survival rates in the range of 91–94%, with 15-year survival approaching 85–92%.
Younger age, prior surgery, and certain diagnoses (such as fracture sequelae) are associated with higher revision risk. Most patients can expect their implant to function well for well over a decade, and many considerably longer.