I offer patients with severe hip arthritis a safe, reliable, and time-tested hip replacement operation.
Hip replacement (THA - total hip arthroplasty) replaces the damaged ball and socket of the hip joint with prosthetic components to relieve pain and restore function. It is one of the most successful operations in all of medicine, with high satisfaction rates and durable long-term results.
Hip replacement is most appropriate for patients with advanced arthritis who have significant pain and loss of function that does not respond to non-surgical care. Common symptoms include deep groin or buttock pain, stiffness that limits walking or getting in and out of a chair, and pain that disrupts sleep.
Nonsurgical treatment options for hip arthritis include anti-inflammatory medications (such as acetaminophen, ibuprofen, or naproxen), activity modification, physical therapy, and corticosteroid injections.
Modern implants are designed to mimic natural anatomy and often feature surfaces that encourage bone ingrowth. The system includes:

Hip replacement is one of the most durable joint procedures available. Large registry studies consistently report implant survival rates of 95–98% at 10 years and approximately 90–95% at 15 years. Younger age and higher activity levels are associated with greater wear over time, but implant materials and designs have improved significantly in recent decades. Most patients can expect their hip replacement to last well over a decade, and many considerably longer. If revision is ever needed, it is typically planned and non-urgent.
The "approach" refers to the surgical path taken to reach the hip joint. While both methods result in excellent long-term outcomes, they offer different early recovery profiles. I perform both approaches, selecting the most appropriate one based on your unique anatomy and clinical needs.
| Anterior approach | Posterior approach | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Muscle-Sparing: Muscles are split, not cut. | Traditional: Involves splitting the gluteus maximus and cutting the small rotator muscles. |
| Advantages | Often associated with a faster early recovery and fewer movement restrictions. | Provides excellent visibility for complex cases and has a long history of proven reliability. |
| Disadvantages | Numbness from proximity with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve skin branches. | Slightly higher dislocation risk compared to the anterior approach; minimized by following post-operative precautions. |